Given below is a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/ are 'strong' argument(s) that justify/ justifies the statement.
Statement: Should the government ban liquor production?

Arguments: I. Yes, this will decrease road accidents and many other health issues.
II. No, this decision will kill the jobs in liquor industry.

We need to evaluate the strength of both arguments independently based on social and economic impact:
* Argument I is strong because liquor consumption is directly linked to social issues like hit-and-run road accidents and critical health problems. Banning it addresses a vital public safety concern.
* Argument II is also strong because the liquor industry employs a large number of people. A complete ban would lead to massive unemployment and loss of livelihood, which is a major economic consequence.

Since both arguments present logical, significant, and realistic outcomes of the statement, both are strong.