Given below is a statement, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow(s) from the given statements.
Statement: Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education.
Conclusion I: Quality of education in India would improve soon.
Conclusion II: Funding alone can enhance quality of education.
- AOnly conclusion I follows
- BOnly conclusion II follows
- CBoth I and II follow
- DNeither I nor II follows
Solution & Step-by-step Explanation
Let's evaluate the conclusions logically:
* Conclusion I: The statement connects quality directly with price (funds) and mentions India is allocating substantial funds to education. Therefore, it logically implies that the quality of education in India is expected to improve. Hence, conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: The statement states that quality has a price tag, but it does not state that funding is the only* requirement or method to enhance quality. The word "alone" makes this conclusion too extreme and restrictive. Hence, conclusion II does not follow.
* Conclusion I: The statement connects quality directly with price (funds) and mentions India is allocating substantial funds to education. Therefore, it logically implies that the quality of education in India is expected to improve. Hence, conclusion I follows.
Conclusion II: The statement states that quality has a price tag, but it does not state that funding is the only* requirement or method to enhance quality. The word "alone" makes this conclusion too extreme and restrictive. Hence, conclusion II does not follow.