In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement:
(I) The DRDO has tested the Smart Anti Airfield Weapon from an Indian Air Force aircraft.
(II) The lightweight high-precision guided bomb is one of the world class weapons systems.
Conclusions:
(I) DRDO Chairman Dr. S. Christopher congratulated the DRDO and the IAF teams for the successful mission.
(II) The test was carried out by IAF's Aircraft and System Testing Establishment.
- AOnly conclusion II follows
- BConclusion I and II both follow
- CNeither I nor II follow
- DOnly conclusion I follows
Solution & Step-by-step Explanation
Both conclusions contain specific outside factual information (mentioning Dr. S. Christopher and the "Aircraft and System Testing Establishment") that cannot be inferred solely from the given two premises/statements. In logical reasoning problems based strictly on statements, conclusions that incorporate external elements not provided in the premises do not follow logically.