In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statement:
(I) Kids rejoice with toys and toys give them new opportunities to think in various ways.
(II) Toys are non-living things that create a virtual world around kids to think and perceive in various ways.
Conclusions:
(I) If children don't play with toys some part of the personality is underdeveloped.
(II) Toys are mandatory and undetachable part of their personality.
- AOnly conclusion II follows
- BConclusion I and II both follow
- CNeither I nor II follow
- DOnly conclusion I follows
Solution & Step-by-step Explanation
Let's analyze the conclusions based strictly on the provided statements:
Conclusion I: The statements mention that toys provide new opportunities to think, but they do not state or imply that a child's personality will remain underdeveloped if they don't play with them. Hence, it does not follow.
Conclusion II: The statements mention the benefits of toys, but nowhere do they say toys are "mandatory and undetachable" components of a child's personality. Hence, it does not follow.
Since neither conclusion can be logically derived directly from the statements, neither I nor II follow.
Conclusion I: The statements mention that toys provide new opportunities to think, but they do not state or imply that a child's personality will remain underdeveloped if they don't play with them. Hence, it does not follow.
Conclusion II: The statements mention the benefits of toys, but nowhere do they say toys are "mandatory and undetachable" components of a child's personality. Hence, it does not follow.
Since neither conclusion can be logically derived directly from the statements, neither I nor II follow.