In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements:
(I) 28 athletes are facing legal cases due to doping incidents.
(II) The new wave of Olympic doping cases is based on evidences.
Conclusions:
(I) The report of doping is based on the test that happen.
(II) Doping practice is very common these days among athletes.
- AOnly conclusion II follows
- BConclusion I and II both follow
- CNeither I nor II follow
- DOnly conclusion I follows
Solution & Step-by-step Explanation
Let's analyze both conclusions independently based strictly on the provided statements:
Conclusion I: "The report of doping is based on the test that happen." Statement II tells us that the doping cases are based on "evidences," but neither statement mentions medical or laboratory testing procedures specifically. Hence, Conclusion I cannot be definitively derived.
Conclusion II: "Doping practice is very common these days among athletes." Statement I states that 28 athletes are facing cases. This specific figure does not provide sufficient context to generalize that the practice is widely "common" among athletes overall.
Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows.
Conclusion I: "The report of doping is based on the test that happen." Statement II tells us that the doping cases are based on "evidences," but neither statement mentions medical or laboratory testing procedures specifically. Hence, Conclusion I cannot be definitively derived.
Conclusion II: "Doping practice is very common these days among athletes." Statement I states that 28 athletes are facing cases. This specific figure does not provide sufficient context to generalize that the practice is widely "common" among athletes overall.
Therefore, neither conclusion I nor II follows.