In this question, three statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to - General Intelligence & Reasoning MCQ Competitive Exam Practice 2026 | ExamTest.live

mediumMCQCompetitive Exam Practice2026General Intelligence & Reasoning

1 attempts0% success rate1 mark

In this question, three statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements.Statements:I. No forest is a jungle.II. All hills are jungles.III. All orchards are hills.Conclusions:I. All orchards are jungles.II. No forest is a hill.

Solution & Step-by-step Explanation

Let's perform step-by-step logical analysis: From statement II ("All hills are jungles") and statement III ("All orchards are hills"), we can conclude using a syllogistic chain that All orchards are jungles. Hence, Conclusion I logically follows.From statement I ("No forest is a jungle") and statement II ("All hills are jungles"), since all hills lie entirely inside jungles, no forest can touch a hill. Therefore, No forest is a hill is definitely true. Hence, Conclusion II logically follows.Both conclusions I and II follow.

Try it yourself before checking the explanation above.

In this question, three statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements.Statements:I. No forest is a jungle.II. All hills are jungles.III. All orchards are hills.Conclusions:I. All orchards are jungles.II. No forest is a hill.

Only conclusion II follows

Both conclusions I and II follow

Neither conclusion I nor II follows

Only conclusion I follows

Practice with timed mock tests and track your performance across General Intelligence & Reasoning.