Statement: Should seniority be the only criterion for promotion?
Arguments:
1. No: It would be an injustice to those juniors who are more deserving and suitable for promotion than their senior counterparts.
2. Yes: Otherwise senior employees may feel humiliated.
3. Yes: Senior employees are more experienced and must be rewarded for the same.
- AOnly '1' is strong.
- BOnly '1' and '2' are strong.
- COnly '1' and '3' are strong.
- DAll arguments are strong.
Solution & Step-by-step Explanation
- Argument 1 is strong because relying exclusively on seniority completely discards merit and talent, which creates workplace stagnation and acts unfair toward high-performing juniors.
* Argument 2 is weak because avoiding subjective emotional responses like "feeling humiliated" is not a sustainable logical basis for corporate or institutional policy.
Argument 3 is weak because while experience is highly valuable, the question asks if seniority should be the only* criterion. Rewarding experience shouldn't happen at the absolute exclusion of capability.
* Argument 2 is weak because avoiding subjective emotional responses like "feeling humiliated" is not a sustainable logical basis for corporate or institutional policy.
Argument 3 is weak because while experience is highly valuable, the question asks if seniority should be the only* criterion. Rewarding experience shouldn't happen at the absolute exclusion of capability.