HomeTestsSearchRankProfile
mediumMCQStaff Selection Commission2026General Intelligence & Reasoning
1 mark

Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered 1, 2 and 3. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All folders are copies.
All books are folders.
No copies are pen.
Conclusions:

No book is a pen.

All books are copies.

Some copies are books.

  1. A
    Only conclusions 1 and 3 follow
  2. B
    All conclusions follow
  3. C
    Only conclusions 1 and 2 follow
  4. D
    Only conclusions 2 and 3 follow

Solution & Step-by-step Explanation

Let's analyze using standard set relations:
From statements: Books⊂Folders⊂Copies.

Also, Copies∩Pen=∅.

Let's evaluate the conclusions:

No book is a pen: Since all books are inside copies, and no copy can be a pen, no book can be a pen either. This conclusion is true.

All books are copies: Since Books⊂Folders and Folders⊂Copies, it follows directly that all books are copies. This conclusion is true.

Some copies are books: Since books are a subset of copies, the region occupied by books represents some part of copies. This conclusion is true.

Therefore, all conclusions follow.

Practice this question

Try it yourself before checking the explanation above.

Three statements are given, followed by three conclusions numbered 1, 2 and 3. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All folders are copies.
All books are folders.
No copies are pen.
Conclusions:

No book is a pen.

All books are copies.

Some copies are books.
A
Only conclusions 1 and 3 follow
B
All conclusions follow
C
Only conclusions 1 and 2 follow
D
Only conclusions 2 and 3 follow

Share This Question

Related Questions

Ready for a Full Test?

Practice with timed mock tests and track your performance across General Intelligence & Reasoning.

Discussion