AIBE 21 2026 Question Paper (07-Jun-2026)

That decree has not yet been passed.

Sufficient cause for not making the application within time.

Error apparent on the face of record.

That the defendant had knowledge of death.

Treat the claimant's allegations as admitted.

Proceed to decide the dispute treating the claimant's case as uncontroverted.

Continue the proceedings without treating such failure as admission.

Terminate the proceedings.

For a fixed term not exceeding ten years

For a term not exceeding the life of the plaintiff

For a period determined solely by the Registrar

For a maximum of five years only

Right to speedy trial

Right to clean and healthy environment

Right to emergency medical care

Right to life and personal liberty

Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal, (2020) 7 SCC 1 - landmark judgment stands as the latest interpretation of the relevant provisions, offering a consistent approach in line with the legislative intent.

The requirement of a certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ("Evidence Act"), is a condition precedent to the admissibility of an electronic record in evidence.

In P.V. Anvar v. P.K. Basheer, the court held that Section 65B is a "complete code" for electronic evidence.

In State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu, reported in AIR 2005 SC 3820, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had held that courts could admit electronic records such as printouts and compact discs (CDs) as prima facie evidence without authentication.